The three christmases

There seem to be three ways in which Christmas is meaningful to people. To Christians, Christmas is a celebration of the incarnation – of God coming to earth. To neo-pagans, Christmas is a celebration of the winter solstice. For consumerism, Christmas is an opportunity for self-indulgence, and its meaning lies in the ways that we hope to be made happy by exchanges of gifts and eating rich food. It seems to me that all three of these Christmases offer meaning in experience, but they also offer metaphysical beliefs that tend to hijack them.

The winter solstice is obviously something we all experience: or at least, those living in temperate or arctic regions of the northern hemisphere. There is a certain anxiety and foreboding about the increasing darkness, and a visceral desire for the light to return, that can make celebrating the winter solstice just a way of recognising these fears and hopes. But if it becomes part of a worship of ‘Nature’, or a desire to placate the gods of darkness, pagan beliefs are not really very far removed from theistic ones. The spring does not return because we ritualise our desire for it to do so, nor does ‘Nature’ make it return.

Consumerism, too, hits experience in some ways. We can feel, and renew, a connection with relatives by exchanging gifts with them and eating special food with them. However, an egoistic belief in ourselves and our objects of desire as unchanging can be strengthened by Christmas indulgence. Gifts can merely feed neomania, a cognitive bias that takes no account of how fast technology will change or how little gifts will matter over time. The gifts and sharing can also often just reinforce the projections in our relationships, perhaps because we haven’t resolved the archetypal view we have of parents, partners or children and recognised them fully as individuals beyond that role in our lives.

I can ride those two Christmases – they both mean something to me, but I hope not too much. A Middle Way in relation to them is relatively easy to see. However, it’s the Christian meaning of Christmas that is both more profound and more troubling. I don’t believe that God was incarnated in the form of Jesus – but I don’t deny it either. Such a claim is so obviously beyond experience that it is best left alone and not indulged one way or the other. Nevertheless, the incarnation is meaningful to me. What’s more, as someone from a culturally Christian background, I think that the profundity of its religious meaning is harder to get away from than I have often recognised. For many years I have just avoided Christmas by going away on retreat, but that has been an avoidance strategy that’s often stopped me really asking myself what it means.Mantegna_Magi

How is the incarnation meaningful to me when I don’t believe in it? I find this easiest to articulate in archetypal terms (if you’re unfamiliar with archetypes, see here). If God is a forward projection of the integrated psyche, the appearance of God in human form is a reassertion of the need to integrate the symbolic God into our lives. The incarnation thus represents the unlikely, baffling glimpses of the possibility of integration that we experience from time to time, often in the symbolic form of a wise old man or woman or of a mandala-like structure.

However, it’s one think to offer that explanation in theory and quite another to recognise it in experience. For me, it is the Renaissance painters who help me get to grips with this best. It seems that they really experienced that meaning fully and directly, and yet had a world-view close enough to the modern to represent it in a way we can relate to now. It is almost as though the Renaissance painters offer a moment between sleep and waking when the symbols are still vividly alive, yet we are still capable of considering them with full critical awareness. It is representations of the Annunciation that seem to capture it most often: a bewildered ordinary girl suddenly recognising a mind-boggling potential within herself. Sometimes, too, the Adoration of the Magi can offer something of that sense of awe in the face of the God archetype.Annunciation Simone_Martini

But I still fail to relate to the vast majority of what goes in churches in relation to Christmas. Not only is it still primarily about belief, but it is all still routinely objectified, trivialised, and sentimentalised. Are children in nativity plays, for example, given even the slightest glimpse of the possibility that the baby Jesus in the manger can mean something within themselves? Are the worshippers given any basic integrative practices – grounded in silence rather than endless metaphysical language – to help them cultivate the awe that they will need to recognise the meaning of Christmas? In the vast majority of churches, I think not.

So, here is my recommendation for an integrative reflection on the meaning of Christmas. Go to your nearest art gallery that has a decent collection of Renaissance art. Go when it is quiet, and preferably by yourself. Look at the Annunciations and the Nativities, and forget whatever you may have loved or hated about the story in school or church. Give yourself time to examine the pictures, and give space to allow awe to arise.

Pictures: Adoration of the Magi by Mantegna & Annunciation by Simone Martini (both public domain)

About Robert M Ellis

Robert M Ellis is the founder and chair of the Middle Way Society, and author of a number of books on Middle Way Philosophy, including the introductory 'Migglism' and the more in-depth 'Middle Way Philosophy' series. He has a Christian background, and about 20 years' past experience of practising Buddhism, but it was his Ph.D. studies in Philosophy that set him on the track of developing a systematic account of the Middle Way beyond any specific tradition. He has earned his living mainly by teaching, and more recently by online tutoring.

3 thoughts on “The three christmases

  1. Hi Robert,

    For me, Christmas has two primary functions. Firstly, it is a chance to celebrate ones family (and friends), with all of the joy, anger and sorrow that this might bring. Secondly, it is a cultural festival that has a long history (which is pre-Christian in origin) and is very much a part of ‘my culture’. I am not nationalistic and I do not obsessively try to preserve this culture, but I accept that I do have one and I accept that it must change, but I treasure it too.

    Of course the commercial side of Christmas forms part of this, and I largely embrace it – while being cautious of it at the same time. I also embrace the Christian side too. I have a nativity on my mantle piece and I enjoy the story very much, I feel no sense of hypocrisy in being an atheist – I also enjoy the Hindu story of Rama during Diwali and Raymond Briggs’s ‘Snowman’ – I don’t feel that I have to believe them.

    Merry Christmas to all at the Middle Way Society!

    Rich

    1. Hi Robert,
      Thank you for your thoughts on Christmas and three ways of ‘looking’ at it, they have given me food for thought. I agree that a pagan belief in Nature is much the same as a Christian belief, metaphysical. I am going to think more about archetypes and perhaps understand more the various kinds you have described earlier. When I dismissed religion, I did not understand their importance, even though I’ve read some of Jung’s work.
      In my famiy we refuse to be lured into spending large amounts of money and have a ‘ no present ‘ policy for adults, we make an exception on birthdays.
      We thoroughly enjoy being all together, we don’t manage it very often during the year, sharing a meal on Christmas Day is fun. This year two of my grandchildren are in Sydney, we’ll miss them, my elder daughter too will not be able to join the Brighton relatives, which will be for the first time in many years. As fond as I am of them all, I know that they have their own lives, I’m always aware too, of the fragile grip we have on life.
      I have liked visits to galleries and churches to look at Renaissance paintings during visits to Florence, Milan, Venice, Paris and London, over the decades. I have a well thumbed copy of Berenson’s The Painters of the Renaissance on my book shelf. Perhaps my next blog should be about a Renaissance painting!

      Hi Rich,
      Thank you for your greeting, I’d like to join you in wishing all ‘migglers’ a happy time too.
      Young children at Christmas time are a real joy to watch as they stare at lights on the tree and sparkling decorations, a belief that Santa Claus will visit, should we discourage that, I think I denied him when asked? It’s like magic, awe even, lost too soon.
      My best wishes to you.

    2. I echo Rich’s greetings to migglers this Christmas, which is already decaying quickly, in anticipation of the spasm we call New Year’s Eve.

      Christmas evokes in me, and in most people I know, the recollection of Christmases past, and of the childhood innocence that characterises Christmas ‘at its best’: the bedtime ritual of hanging up stockings on the fireplace; the unique excitement of waking in the early hours to a crackling heaviness of presents at the foot of the bed, the whispered cries, “He’s been!”, the strangeness of eating chocolate pennies or liquorice allsorts on the bed before the grey dawn breaks, and all the rest….

      The pangs of nostalgia are just as keen, and just as much to be savoured. Christmas is (for me) an unique marker on life’s way, something of each and every Christmas seems to me folded in to the overall experience, like a snowball rolled across soft snow, it grows layer on layer, until it can be rolled no more.

      It is, as Rich suggests, a shared cultural experience of great significance, despite its being trammeled by commercialism and (almost) redundant religious top-dressing. I know I would mourn its passing away altogether, although I can’t say why.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CAPTCHA
Change the CAPTCHA codeSpeak the CAPTCHA code
 

Get a Gravatar